
Human decision
AI suggestions stay reviewable.
The platform shows suggestions, review status and expert sign-off together instead of presenting results as a black box.

Why HAIZOP
Safety analysis is a conservative discipline — rightly so. HAIZOP amplifies engineering expertise instead of replacing it.
[ 01 ] Important reasons
Time savings and traceability
ROI calculator
Using your own assumptions for effort, workshop size and study scope, the HAIZOP ROI calculator shows potential savings. Public license prices are not displayed; a tailored proposal is available on request.

Human decision
The platform shows suggestions, review status and expert sign-off together instead of presenting results as a black box.

Audit-ready
Nodes, deviations, safeguards and changes remain structured study data.

Process industry
Equipment, P&IDs and regulatory references take priority over generic chat output.
The AI creates suggestions, the engineer decides. The review gate makes visible which results were reviewed, corrected or rejected.
Safeguard suggestions and their assessments are shown with reasoning, context and review status. HAIZOP does not sell magic; it provides a traceable workflow.
BetrSichV, TRBS/TRGS, pressure-equipment rules, BImSchG, DGUV and IEC/ISO references can be used as technical orientation where they are relevant and available for the scenario.
Operation in the agreed EU/Germany environment, data processing agreement per Art. 28 GDPR and private-deployment assessment for enterprise cases. Customer data is not used for training; subprocessors and third-country exceptions are documented.
HAZOP remains the core. Connected assessments such as SIL, LOPA, FMEA, Bow-Tie, Cyber HAZOP and Management of Change can build on the same study data.
The broad range of equipment and component types makes HAIZOP usable across different industries — from hydrogen and chemicals to energy infrastructure.
[ 02 ] Way of working
Simplifying HAZOP workflows

Way of working
The comparison is not human versus machine; it is scattered follow-up versus prepared, reviewable study data.
Every deviation is discussed in the workshop — five to eight specialists over several days.
HAIZOP prepares scenarios, consequences and safeguards; the team reviews, corrects and confirms them. The IEC 61882 methodology stays untouched, while the starting point for discussion becomes more structured.
The study is available as a PDF. Years later it is hard for an auditor to search.
Nodes, deviations and safeguards remain typed fields — with review status, comments and export history.
Risk ratings depend on the experience and daily form of the participants; inconsistencies often surface too late or not at all.
Ratings are documented in a structured way; unusual differences can be marked and justified during review. The decision remains with the expert team.
The audit appointment means days of preparation — gathering documents, reconciling versions.
Version status, approval chain, risk distribution and audit trail live together in the system. That reduces later reconstruction from scattered files.
[ 03 ] Questions
No. HAIZOP prepares the laborious groundwork — deviations, causes, consequences, safeguards — and structures the documentation. The professional assessment, the sign-off and the responsibility stay with the engineer. The review gate makes that step visible.
Because customers should evaluate HAIZOP as a workflow, not through a single AI provider. Provider, DPA and subprocessor questions are answered in procurement and security reviews through the approved documentation.
In an enterprise or pilot context we assess a customer-specific Docker/private-deployment option. The standard operating model remains HAIZOP-managed access in the agreed EU/Germany environment.